Doctrine of Pantheism between Theoretical Proving and Refuting

Abstract

The paper in question deals with the theory of pantheism, opinions of scholars and their differences, some prove it, some deny it: some old philosophers of Malata s, India, Christian theologians and Islamic mystics prove it to count the existence as one truth, here is the eye of truth, but the possible entities are one manifestation of the existence, the Almighty. On the contrary, the other camp went on to deny this and counted existence as disparate facts. The importance of the research lies in the accuracy of this issue and the seriousness of its direct impact on the most important believes and doctrines. Therefore, we decided a direct inferential approach managed by proof, and indirectly based on the mental processes that necessitate the successor to verify their reality. The research comes in two sections : the first is devoted to clarifying the foundations and principles on which this theory is based, which is the moral participation of existence without verbal, the authenticity of existence and the legality of the meaning, and the fact that existence, for them,  is one skeptical fact, and the presentation of the most important arguments by which it was  inferred to prove these foundations, and to show the extent of their  compliance, and then the arguments decided by those who deny it . The second is that we allocated it to clarify the truth of the saying about the unity of existence and its meaning and the consequent supplies and effects, and we mentioned the most important arguments to prove this theory and its problems and the most important arguments of its response, evidences and veracity.